PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2026Journal of Eating Disorders0 citationsOpen Access

Psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the adult Nine Item ARFID screen (Persian- NIAS)

View Full Paper
SBSara BiglariIsfahan University of Medical SciencesHZHana F. ZickgrafRogers Behavioral HealthAFAwat FeiziIsfahan University of Medical Sciences

Key Points

  • Assess the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Nine Item ARFID screen among Iranian adults.
  • Culturally adapted the adult Nine Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake disorder screen into Persian.
  • Conducted a methodological cross-sectional study with 936 adults in Isfahan, Iran.
  • Evaluated reliability with Intra Class Correlation and Cronbach’s alpha, and validity using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.
  • Persian-NIAS demonstrated excellent test–retest reliability (ICCs: 0.989–0.995).
  • Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranged from 0.803 to 0.879, indicating good to excellent internal consistency.
  • Exploratory factor analysis revealed three factors: picky eating, appetite, and fear.

Abstract

Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is an eating disorder characterized by restrictive eating that leads to weight loss or failure to grow, nutritional deficiency, supplement dependence, and/or psychosocial impairment. The aim of the present study was to culturally adapt and investigate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the adult Nine Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake disorder screen (NIAS), among general population of Iranian adults. This methodological cross—sectional study was conducted among 936 Persian-speaking adults, living in Isfahan, Iran. Translation of the NIAS was performed using forward–backward method. Intra Class Correlation (ICC) and Cronbach’s α were used to assess test–retest reliability and internal consistency, respectively. Construct validity was investigated by using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Convergent and divergent validity was determined using BMI, adult eating behavior questionnaire (AEBQ), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Persian version of the NIAS showed excellent test–retest reliability in all domains (ICCs: 0.989–0.995). The computed Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for dimensions of Persian-NIAS were in the range good to excellent (alpha: 0.803–0.879). Persian-NIAS showed good known-group validity and differentiated persons with different levels of BMI from each other (P < 0.05). Construct validity evaluated by EFA led to extraction of three factors (picky eating, appetite, and fear), and the CFA confirmed the adequacy of extracted construct from EFA (CFI = 0.979, TLI = 0.958, SRMR = 0.037 and RMSEA = 0.077). Convergent and divergent Validity revealed significant positive or negative correlations between Persian-NIAS dimensions and different dimensions of the AEBQ, and HADS. The Persian version of the NIAS is a reliable and valid instrument with applicability in a broad range of the population of Persian-speaking adults for assessing AFRID eating disorders in research projects. Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is an eating disorder characterized by restrictive eating that leads to weight loss or failure to grow, nutritional deficiency, supplement dependence, and/or psychosocial impairment. Due to the lack of ARFID assessment tools in Persian, the aim of our study was to culturally adapt and investigate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the adult Nine Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake disorder screen (NIAS), among general population of Iranian adults. Our findings suggest that the Persian version of the NIAS is a reliable and valid instrument with applicability in a broad range of the population of Persian-speaking adults for assessing AFRID eating disorders in research projects.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Biglari et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699f95951bc9fecf3dab374dhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-026-01555-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper