PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 20260 citationsOpen Access

EACTS Expert Consensus Document on protected cardiac surgery: pre-emptive use of temporary mechanical circulatory support in adult cardiac surgery patients at high risk for perioperative low cardiac output syndrome

View Full Paper
RLRoberto LorussoLSLeonardo SalazarGNGaik Nersesian

Key Points

  • To provide guidelines on pre-emptive use of temporary mechanical circulatory support in high-risk adult cardiac surgery patients.
  • Guidance developed by a multidisciplinary task force.
  • Structured risk stratification and early initiation of support are emphasized.
  • Clinical pathways and algorithms proposed for device management in various scenarios.
  • Highlights significant morbidity and mortality associated with low cardiac output syndrome.
  • Suggests improved decision-making can enhance outcomes for high-risk surgical patients.
  • Identifies knowledge gaps in device selection and cost-effectiveness analyses.

Abstract

Perioperative low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS) remains a significant complication in adult cardiac surgery, contributing to substantial morbidity, prolonged intensive care, and increased mortality. Its incidence is expected to rise further due to the evolving complexity of referred surgical patients, often characterised by advanced age, multiple comorbidities, challenging anatomy, and impaired haemodynamics. Despite advances in pharmacological and perioperative care, outcomes for high-risk patients have not shown significant improvement, prompting interest in temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) as a proactive strategy. This Expert Consensus Document from the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) presents the first dedicated guidance on the pre-emptive use of tMCS in high-risk adult cardiac surgical patients. Developed by a multidisciplinary task force, it emphasises structured risk stratification, early initiation, and individualised device management informed by interdisciplinary Heart Team discussions. The document proposes clinical pathways for patient selection, defines criteria for tMCS initiation, and provides practical algorithms for various scenarios, including advanced heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and post-cardiotomy LCOS. It reviews the current evidence on available tMCS devices, such as intra-aortic balloon pumps, microaxial flow pumps, veno-arterial extracorporeal life support and hybrid strategies, and addresses perioperative care, ICU protocols, ethical considerations, as well as informed consent and support withdrawal. Despite promising results, substantial knowledge gaps remain, including long-term outcome data, device selection criteria, and cost-effectiveness analyses. This consensus aims to support clinical decision-making, standardise practice, and stimulate research to improve outcomes in a growing population of high-risk surgical patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lorusso et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699f95a81bc9fecf3dab3982https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-292373
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Prophylactic temporary mechanical circulatory support: The new paradigm in cardiac surgery2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2Management of perioperative low cardiac output state without extracorporeal life support: What is feasible?2010 · 19 citations
  3. 3A national evaluation of perioperative temporary mechanical circulatory support infrastructure and governance in the UK: A survey of adult cardiac surgical centres2026
  4. 4Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in High‐Risk Cardiac Surgery: Contemporary Practice and Insights From U.S. Transplant Centers2026
  5. 5Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support.2026