Analysis shows varying effective conductivity in membrane electrode assemblies, highlighting the importance of microstructures.
Through-plane electronic transport in porous membrane electrode assembly (MEA) electrodes is governed by the three-dimensional (3D) connectivity of the conducting phase. Here, we quantify the role of the spanning-cluster fraction P∞, defined as the fraction of conducting-phase voxels that belong to the z-spanning connected component in a finite reconstructed volume, on effective conductivity using scanning electron microscopy (SEM)-informed 3D reconstructions of four archetypal morphologies: a granular catalyst layer (CL), labeled CL1; a fibrous gas diffusion layer (GDL), labeled GDL1; an open-cell foam (OCF); and a micro-fibrous non-woven (MFM), labeled MFM1. Each morphology is reconstructed on a 150 × 150 × 150 voxel grid, and z-spanning connectivity is identified with a 26-neighbor flood-fill algorithm. Steady-state conduction is solved by a finite-volume method (FVM) with an imposed potential difference between the z—faces and no-flux lateral boundaries. Although all samples exhibit through-thickness connectivity, the normalized conductivity σeff/σbulk varies widely, from ≈0.134 (MFM1) to ≈0.706 (OCF). The corresponding (P∞, σeff/σbulk) pairs are (0.996, ≈ 0.306) for CL1, (0.999, ≈ 0.303) for GDL1, (0.997, ≈ 0.706) for OCF, and (0.901, ≈ 0.134) for MFM1. OCF exhibits the highest response due to vertically coherent channels, whereas MFM1 underperforms due to laminated constrictions; CL1 and GDL1 lie in an intermediate regime with nearly isotropic skeletons. Overall, the results show that while a z-spanning connected component is required for measurable conduction, the magnitude of σeff is dictated by percolating-skeleton quality (bottlenecks, cross-sectional constrictions, and pathway alignment) rather than phase amount alone. The proposed descriptors therefore enable percolation-aware screening metrics for designing and comparing MEA-relevant GDL and CL microstructures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodríguez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: