PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2026Journal of Transportation Engineering Part A Systems0 citations

Accounting for Mode Choice Heterogeneity under Travel Demand Management Strategies in a Developing Country

View Full Paper
ASAditya SaxenaKRK. V. Krishna RaoVSVirendra Sethi

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how different socioeconomic groups choose their travel modes under travel demand management strategies.
  • Utilized RP-SP data set to analyze travel behavior
  • Estimated a random parameters latent class choice model (RP-LCCM)
  • Identified distinct behavioral segments within the populations based on income and age
  • Compared satisfaction with travel air quality across segments
  • Identified two latent classes: younger, cost-sensitive individuals and older, time-sensitive individuals
  • Class 1 prefers public transport like metro; Class 2 prefers private modes such as cars and two-wheelers
  • Satisfaction with travel air quality is higher in Class 2 (82%) compared to Class 1 (67.4%)
  • Demonstrated that transport demand management impacts vary across different socioeconomic groups

Abstract

This study examines differences in work trip mode choice behavior under the combined implementation of congestion pricing (a push measure) and metro system introduction (a pull measure) in Mumbai, India. A combined revealed and stated preference (RP–SP) data set is used to estimate a random parameters latent class choice model (RP-LCCM), enabling the identification of distinct behavioral segments within the population. The results reveal two latent classes. Class 1 (43.48%) comprises younger and lower-income individuals who are highly cost-sensitive and less time-sensitive. They are willing to tolerate longer travel and access times and show a higher inclination toward using public transport, particularly metro services. Class 2 (56.62%) represents older, higher-income, and more educated respondents who are more time-sensitive and less cost-sensitive. This class exhibits a stronger preference for private modes such as cars and two-wheelers, valuing convenience and reduced travel time. Satisfaction with travel air quality is also higher in Class 2 (82%) compared to Class 1 (67.4%), reflecting perceptual and lifestyle differences. The estimated scale factor between RP and SP data indicates consistency in behavioral responses across data sets. The findings demonstrate significant heterogeneity in mode choice, showing that the impact of transport demand management (TDM) measures such as congestion pricing and metro expansion varies across income and life-cycle groups. The study emphasizes the importance of incorporating socioeconomic diversity and behavioral segmentation in policy formulation to promote efficient and equitable urban mobility.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Saxena et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe24b95ddcd3a253e6278https://doi.org/10.1061/jtepbs.teeng-9393
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper