Constructs and validates a metabolite risk score for obesity in Koreans, suggesting its potential in molecular diagnostics.
Background/Objectives: Obesity is currently diagnosed by anthropometric measures such as body mass index and waist circumference, while molecular-based diagnostic approaches have not yet been established. The present study aims to investigate the clinical meaning of a metabolite risk score (MRS) from the perspective of molecular diagnostics for obesity in Koreans. Methods: A total of 200 plasma samples were collected from 100 healthy individuals and 100 individuals with obesity through the Korea Biobank Network. Both groups were sub-divided into a discovery set and a validation set (n = 50 per group in each set). Metabolite profiling, cytokines, and oxidized (ox)-LDL were analyzed cross-sectionally. The MRS was constructed using statistically significant metabolites chosen based on linear regression analysis. Results: In the discovery set, systolic blood pressure, tumor necrosis factor-α, and interleukin-6 emerged as conventional obesity-related factors. Bilirubin and oleic acid were selected as key metabolites significantly associated with obesity. The MRS equation was constructed using these key metabolites through a weighted approach. In the validation set, the MRS demonstrated acceptable diagnostic accuracy for obesity (AUC = 0.748, p = 0.005). Furthermore, its diagnostic performance was enhanced when combined with the conventional obesity-related factors (AUC = 0.816, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The MRS, calculated using bilirubin and oleic acid, effectively complemented conventional obesity-related factors in the diagnosis of obesity. Although the MRS currently serves as a supportive molecular framework for obesity assessment, future refinement may improve its performance and broaden its applicability to other metabolic diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hye Jin Yoo (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: