This review demonstrates the potential of AI-driven mass spectrometry to enhance structural elucidation in traditional Chinese medicine, suggesting new analytical tools.
Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) possesses unique advantages in disease prevention and treatment, yet its inherent complexity and diversity poses tremendous challenges for structural elucidation, mechanism research and bioactivity characterization. High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) technology demonstrates immense potential in traditional Chinese medicine analysis due to its high sensitivity, high resolution, high throughput, and high efficiency. However, its application in traditional Chinese medicine research remains constrained by the lack of intelligent analytical methods and unified standardized databases. Therefore, this paper focuses on the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and mass spectrometry, providing a systematic review of the applications and potential of AI-driven mass spectrometry analysis in structural elucidation, data resource integration, multi-omics mechanism studies, and chemical biology. Furthermore, this paper emphasizes that by leveraging artificial intelligence models to learn the complex mapping from chemical structures to biological functions, fragment-based characterization has emerged as the bridge connecting chemical structures with biological activities. Molecular fragments themselves serve as the core “knowledge units” that carry bioactive information. Future research will focus on establishing high-quality mass spectrometry databases for the complete chemical profiles of traditional Chinese medicine and promoting the standardization and open sharing of mass spectrometry databases, thereby advancing the integration of artificial intelligence and mass spectrometry in traditional Chinese medicine analysis and providing new tools for traditional Chinese medicine research. Graphical abstract: http://links.lww.com/AHM/A220
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: