Model predicts uranium concentration and optimizes acid injection in in-situ leaching, indicating improved efficiency.
To improve the accuracy of uranium concentration prediction and the scientific regulation of acid injection concentration in In-situ leaching uranium mining, this study proposes a deep learning model that integrates Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Gated Recurrent Units (GRU), and an attention mechanism (CNN–GRU–Attention). The proposed model leverages selected key features as inputs, integrating the local feature extraction capabilities of CNNs, the temporal sequence modeling strengths of GRUs, and the critical information enhancement provided by the attention mechanism to dynamically forecast trends in extraction uranium concentration. Experimental results show that the proposed model achieves a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.0543, a mean squared error (MSE) of 0.0315, and a coefficient of determination ( R² ) of 0.915 on the test set, outperforming LSTM, CNN–LSTM, and Transformer models, particularly in sections with abrupt concentration changes. Ablation experiments further confirm the significant contributions of the CNN and attention modules to model performance. Single-variable simulation analysis based on the model reveals that uranium concentration exhibits a “rise-then-stabilize” pattern with increasing acid injection concentration. The optimal acid injection concentrations under different residual uranium reserves are determined as 11.69 g/L, 10.85 g/L, 11.41 g/L, and 10.99 g/L, respectively, achieving production optimization while balancing leaching efficiency and cost.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: