Argues for epistemic humility in understanding knowledge, suggesting a framework for consciousness and science.
This paper argues that humanity’s claim to final knowledge is philosophically and scientifically premature. Drawing on paradigm shifts in astronomy, contemporary cosmology’s “5% visible universe” framework, and phenomenology, the paper defends epistemic humility as a structural necessity of both science and consciousness. Engaging thinkers such as Thomas Kuhn, Karl Popper, Edmund Husserl, and Martin Heidegger, it proposes a “zero and infinity” framework in which reality is understood not as a final answer to possess, but as an open question that educates consciousness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mayank Singh (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: