An experience report details how AI coding agents created operational software without human oversight, indicating effective collaboration patterns.
AI coding agents can generate code from natural language, but most workflows assume a human who can read and review that code. What happens when the human cannot? This experience report documents a 45-day project in which I—a PharmD/PhD statistician who cannot read Python code—built an operational MCP server (~190k LOC including tests) using AI agents with zero human-written code. I could not inspect the implementation, so code review was impossible. After an initial failure where specification-driven development produced modules that "looked right but did not run," the project pivoted to an ADR-driven control plane governing a fast-changing data plane (code, tests). The control plane—decision logs (ADRs), policies (rules), procedures (commands), and quality gates—stabilized inter-module contracts and coordination. I describe this control plane's minimal components, how failures drove its evolution, and practical patterns for collaborating with AI agents without inspecting code.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katsuya Shibuki (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: