Develops and evaluates porous titanium alloys for biomedical implants, suggesting optimal alloy compositions for mechanical and corrosion resistance.
Titanium alloys are widely used for biomedical implants due to their favorable mechanical properties, corrosion resistance, and biocompatibility; however, their high stiffness relative to bone can lead to stress shielding. This study developed porous Ti–10Zr–xNb alloys (x = 5, 10, 15, 20 wt %) via powder metallurgy using 600 MPa cold compaction, followed by high-vacuum sealed sintering to reduce stiffness through controlled porosity. All alloys exhibited a biphasic α + β microstructure, with the β phase fraction increasing with the Nb content. The Ti–10Zr–20Nb alloy achieved the highest mechanical performance, with a compressive strength of 844.70 ± 20.92 MPa and an elastic modulus of 32.51 ± 1.52 GPa, within the modulus range of cortical bone. Electrochemical tests (OCP, EIS, PDP) conducted in simulated body fluid revealed a gradual decline in corrosion resistance with the increasing Nb content despite nearly constant porosity levels. This behavior is attributed to Nb-induced β phase stabilization and its likely influence on passive film defect chemistry, which may promote defect-assisted charge transport and reduce the barrier effectiveness of the passive film under porous conditions. Among the compositions, Ti–10Zr–5Nb exhibited the highest corrosion resistance, with Ecorr = −0.0361 V and Icorr = 17.24 μA/cm2, whereas alloys with a higher Nb content showed more negative corrosion potentials and elevated corrosion currents. Overall, Ti–10Zr–20Nb offers the best mechanical compatibility for orthopedic load-bearing implants, whereas Ti–10Zr–5Nb provides favorable electrochemical stability for dental environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: