PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2026Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society0 citationsOpen Access

Web-Halo Model (WHM): Accurate non-linear matter power spectrum predictions without free parameters

View Full Paper
SBS. BriedenFBFlorian BeutlerMPMarcos Pellejero-Ibáñez

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop a parameter-free model for predicting matter clustering, overcoming limitations of existing halo models.
  • Introduced the Web-Halo Model (WHM) without free fitting parameters.
  • Incorporated collapsed structures (filaments and sheets) alongside haloes.
  • Utilized 1-loop Lagrangian Perturbation Theory (1ℓ-LPT) for accuracy.
  • Matched N-body simulation power spectra in the 2-halo to 1-halo transition regime.
  • Achieved better than 2% accuracy at multiple scales (k = 0.4, 0.7, and 1.3 h Mpc−1).
  • Demonstrated consistent performance across all tested redshifts (z = 0.0, 0.8, and 1.5).
  • Surpassed the performance of HMcode-2020, especially at higher redshifts.

Abstract

Abstract We present a parameter-free variant of the halo model that significantly improves the precision of matter clustering predictions, particularly in the challenging 1-halo to 2-halo transition regime, where standard halo models often fail. Unlike HMcode-2020, which relies on 12 phenomenological parameters, our approach achieves comparable or superior accuracy without any free fitting parameters. This new web-halo model (WHM) extends the traditional halo model by incorporating structures that have collapsed along two dimensions (filaments) and one dimension (sheets), in addition to haloes, and combines these with 1-loop Lagrangian Perturbation Theory (1ℓ-LPT) in a consistent framework. We show that WHM matches N-body simulation power spectra within the precision of state-of-the-art emulators at the 2-halo to 1-halo transition regime at all redshifts. Specifically, the WHM achieves better than 2 per cent accuracy up to scales of k = 0.4 h Mpc−1, 0.7 h Mpc−1, and 1.3 h Mpc−1 at redshifts z = 0.0, 0.8, and 1.5, respectively, for both the baccoemu and EuclidEmu2 emulators, across their full W0WaCDM + ∑mν cosmological parameter space. This marks a substantial improvement over 1ℓ-LPT and HMcode-2020, the latter of which performs similarly at low redshift but deteriorates at higher redshifts despite its 12 tuned parameters. We publicly release WHM as WHMcode, integrated into existing HMcode implementations for CAMB and CLASS.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Brieden et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe36b95ddcd3a253e749fhttps://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stag338
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Dynamics-based halo model for large scale structure2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2High-redshift Galaxies from JWST Observations in More Realistic Dark Matter Halo Models2025
  3. 3Halo Asymmetry in the Modeling of Galaxy Clustering2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4Halo asymmetry in the modelling of galaxy clustering2024
  5. 5Deep learning insights into non-universality in the halo mass function2024 · 2 citations