PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2026Emergency Radiology0 citationsOpen Access

Diagnosis of acute appendicitis at a pediatric emergency department within a general hospital

CJCade A. JohnsonCPCatherine M. PivalizzaHCHei Kit Chan

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the diagnostic performance and length of stay of ultrasound and rapid MRI in evaluating appendicitis in children.
  • Conducted a retrospective diagnostic accuracy study in a pediatric emergency department
  • Included patients under 18 years with abdominal pain receiving imaging for appendicitis
  • Reported sensitivity and specificity for ultrasound and rapid MRI
  • Analyzed length of stay for different imaging modalities
  • Performed sensitivity analyses based on imaging type
  • Ultrasound sensitivity was 65.3%, and specificity was 97.0%
  • Rapid MRI sensitivity was 98.3%, and specificity was 96.1%
  • Ultrasound had the shortest median emergency department length of stay at 5.3 hours
  • Rapid MRI increased the median length of stay to 7.9 hours
  • Combination of ultrasound and rapid MRI resulted in the longest length of stay at 10.6 hours

Abstract

Ultrasound (US) has evolved as the principal imaging modality in the evaluation of pediatric appendicitis due to inherent advantages but may vary in performance based on setting. Rapid focused Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rapid MRI) is a feasible alternative, but emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) may be impacted. We wished to determine the performance and LOS of US and rapid MRI in a pediatric ED within a general hospital in the evaluation of appendicitis. We conducted a retrospective diagnostic accuracy study of patients < 18 years of age with abdominal pain receiving imaging for evaluation of appendicitis (US or rapid MRI). We report descriptive statistics on demographics and clinical characteristics of the study population. We conducted a sensitivity analysis by the different imaging type and combinations performed. Sensitivity and specificity for US and rapid MRI were 65.3% (95% CI: 57.5%–72.5%); 97.0% (95% CI: 94.5%–98.5%) and 98.3% (95% CI: 90.6%–100.0%); 96.1%, (95% CI: 91.1%–98.7%), respectively. US alone was associated with the shortest median ED LOS (5.3 hours, IQR 3.9–7.8), followed by rapid MRI alone (7.9 hours, IQR 5.4–8.6). US with subsequent rapid MRI was associated with the longest ED LOS (10.6 hours, IQR 7.6–13.3). US was nondiagnostic for a substantial number of studies performed resulting in suboptimal sensitivity for the diagnosis of appendicitis. Rapid MRI had better sensitivity but a greater LOS. Future work should focus on determining potential barriers that exist and incorporating strategies to enhance US performance and/or decrease rapid MRI LOS.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Johnson et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe38b95ddcd3a253e7787https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-026-02442-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper