Experimental investigation reveals how governance factors influence AI-assisted credibility judgments in professionals, suggesting implications for industry practices.
This project contains the registration, materials, measures, and supplementary analyses for an experimental study examining how epistemic governance mechanisms affect professional credibility judgments of AI-assisted knowledge outputs. The study comprises a primary experiment (N = 480; 2×2×2 between-subjects factorial design) testing the effects of provenance visibility, accountability clarity, and AI disclosure framing on perceived credibility, defensibility, and challenge behaviour among UK-based professionals in consulting, legal, and technical advisory sectors. A supplementary experiment (N = 240; 2×2 design) tests contestability mechanisms. The project is associated with a doctoral research programme at Hawkins University conducted under the supervision of Prof. Dr. Joseph Kwaku Mihaye.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suela Pirushi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: