Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational study identifies predictors for first-pass intubation success in patients with oral cavity tumours, suggesting important airway parameters.
Background and Aim: Video-laryngoscopes are commonly used for intubation in patients with restricted mouth openings. However, the predictors of difficult video-laryngoscope-guided intubation have not been clearly defined in the literature. The primary objective of this study was to identify the parameters that predict first-pass success with video-laryngoscope-guided nasal intubation in patients with oral cavity tumours and restricted mouth openings. The secondary objective was to determine the minimum mouth opening above which successful first-attempt intubation with a video-laryngoscope was achieved in this population. Methodology: After Institutional Review Board approval, a single-centre prospective observational study on 30 oral cavity tumour patients with mouth openings <5 cm was conducted. Both conventional and ultrasound-guided airway parameters – intercondylar distance (ICD), tongue thickness, skin to hyoid distance (DSH), skin to epiglottis distance (DSE) and hyomental distance ratio (HMDR) – were measured after screening. Patients were intubated with C-MAC D-Blade video-laryngoscopy. Successful safe video-laryngoscopy intubation is defined as first-attempt intubation, intubation time <60 s, without using any adjuncts and no adverse events. Results: The incidence of safe single-pass intubation was 12.79%, and the incidence of difficult laryngoscopy requiring more than 1 attempt was 17.2%. The mean interincisor distance, which was intubated within 60 s, was 2.97 ± 0.61 cm. Amongst the ultrasound parameters, HMDR was significantly different ( P = 0.05) in two groups requiring more than one attempt at intubation. ICD has a positive correlation with interincisor distance (IID). Conclusion: In patients with oral cavity tumours, restricted mouth opening, HMDR and ICD are the reliable predictors of difficult intubation with a video-laryngoscope. IID of 2.97 ± 0.61 cm was safely intubated within 60 s.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramkrishnan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: