A framework demonstrates secure and efficient gradient transmission management in distributed machine learning, indicating significant performance improvements.
Secure and bandwidth-conscious transmission of model updates is a central bottleneck in distributed machine learning. Existing secure aggregation and homomorphic encryption pipelines either reveal more than the task requires or incur prohibitive computation and communication costs. We introduce a verifiable functional encryption (VFE) framework that releases only the intended linear functions of client gradients while providing end-to-end integrity and privacy guarantees under standard lattice assumptions. Our instantiation, FlowAgg-FE, combines two novel components. First, KS-IPFE, a key-splittable inner-product FE scheme, supports per-round weighted aggregation, vector packing, and on-the-fly function changes without client re-encryption; function keys are distributed across two non-colluding helpers, eliminating a single point of trust and enabling lightweight, homomorphically verifiable tags on decrypted outputs. Second, PaS-Stream is a rate-adaptive encryption-and-compression pipeline that couples sketch-based gradient compression with batched FE ciphertext streaming, ensuring unbiased aggregation in the presence of stragglers and dropouts. We further bind client-side clipping to zero-knowledge range proofs and offer an optional differentially private release layer that composes with FE to yield (ε,δ)-privacy. A prototype based on LWE demonstrates practicality across cross-device and cross-silo training: client uplink is reduced by 1.9–3.4× and server CPU time by 1.6× versus state-of-practice encrypted secure aggregation, with accuracy within 0.3% of plaintext baselines and correctness preserved under up to 30% client dropout. These results show that verifiable FE can make secure, communication-efficient gradient transmission viable, as appropriate for theme of security and privacy in distributed machine learning of the Special Issue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: