PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2026Humanity & Society0 citations

Defended Neighborhoods, Urban Renewal, and “Hillbilly Removal” in Uptown, Chicago, 1955 – 1970

View Full Paper
MMMatthew H. McLeskeyState University of New York at OswegoRGRoger GuyState University of New York at Oswego

Key Points

  • This article aims to explore the racialized dynamics of urban renewal in Uptown, Chicago, focusing on the displacement of Appalachian whites.
  • Analyzed historical events related to urban renewal in Uptown, Chicago from 1955 to 1970.
  • Utilized frameworks from Matt Wray and Gerald D. Suttles to interpret social processes.
  • Examined local narratives surrounding concepts of 'white trash' and 'defended neighborhoods.'
  • Documented the significant influx of southern and Appalachian whites in postwar Chicago.
  • Revealed that urban renewal efforts triggered group conflicts and social tensions.
  • Highlighted how elite narratives of 'otherness' were used to justify economic initiatives.

Abstract

This article examines urban renewal in a neighborhood where most residents were white in a uniquely racialized case of urban Appalachian displacement to better understand the broader social processes of otherness and undesirability involved in urban renewal. In the period discussed in this article, the Uptown neighborhood experienced the largest influx of southern and Appalachian whites in Postwar Chicago and was the setting for a contentious struggle over urban renewal for about 10 years. Our primary framework for explaining the events surrounding urban renewal in Uptown, Chicago are drawn from the concept of “ white trash ” from Matt Wray and the “ defended neighborhood ” from Gerald D. Suttles. Like Suttles, we argue that urban planning resulting in renewal initiatives involve politics and cultural conceptions of what the neighborhood ought to resemble and who should reside there, and, therefore, will be likely to engender group conflict. The term “white trash” functions as a way for some socially comfortable white people to construct a debased “other” and solidify their own sense of superiority, reinforcing the social and ideological boundaries of whiteness as centered in middle-class norms. By coupling these frameworks, we reveal the politics of otherness deployed by local elites to justify their economic development initiatives.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

McLeskey et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe3ec95ddcd3a253e7f71https://doi.org/10.1177/01605976261418657
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Destruction in the Name of Progress: Durham’s Urban Removal2025
  2. 2Trumbull Talk: White Vernacular and the Politics of Persecution, 1953-19542024
  3. 3New methods for old questions: Predicting historical urban renewal areas in the United States2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4Towards a Whiter Woodlawn: Racism and the University of Chicago's Employer-Assisted Housing Program2020
  5. 5"So Rude and So Crude"2024