Comparative study measures muscle strength in healthy individuals, suggesting hand-held device is reliable and valid.
The study aim was to compare lower extremity muscle strength measurements obtained during the quadriceps set exercise in healthy individuals. Twenty-four healthy individuals (23.1±2.1 years, 13 females) were recruited. Lower extremity muscle strength measurements were obtained using a hand-held dynamometer during the quadriceps set exercise and using an isokinetic dynamometer with isometric testing at 30° of knee flexion and at 60°/s concentrically. Validity was assessed using Pearson correlation and Bland and Altman analyses, while within-session reliability was assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Also, standard error of measurement (SEM%), minimal detectable change (MDC95) and minimal important change (MIC95) at the 95% confidence interval were assessed. Hand-held dynamometer measurements during the quadriceps set exercise were strongly correlated with isometric measurements at 30° of knee flexion (r=0.598, p=0.002) and concentric measurements at 60°/s (r=0.535, p=0.007) on the isokinetic dynamometer. The hand-held dynamometer demonstrated a good within-session reliability (ICC=0.88, 95%CI:0.80–0.94), while the isometric measurements at 30° of knee flexion (ICC=0.91, 95%CI:0.85–0.95) and the isokinetic measurements at 60°/s (ICC=0.92, 95%CI:0.86–0.96) demonstrated an excellent within-session reliability. Across all measurements, SEM% values ranged between 9–11%. The MDC95 was calculated as 5.97 (95%CI:3.5–8.5) for the hand-held dynamometer, 34.25 (95%CI:16.9–51.8) for the isometric measurements at 30° of knee flexion, and 40.0 (95%CI:20.8–59.3) for the isokinetic measurements at 60°/s. The MIC95 values corresponded to an approximate change of 14% for the hand-held dynamometer and 19% for the isokinetic dynamometer relative to the mean muscle strength values of healthy participants. These findings indicate that the use of the hand-held dynamometer as a measurement method in the quadriceps set exercise position is valid and reliable, and it may serve as a viable alternative to isokinetic testing, particularly in the early postoperative phase when isokinetic strength assessment is often considered unsafe.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yıldırım et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: