PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2026Machine Learning and Data Science in Geotechnics0 citationsOpen Access

Active learning-driven ensemble framework for efficient and robust reliability analysis in geotechnical engineering

View Full Paper
XLXi LiuBGI Group (China)BLBin LiuTongji UniversityYLYadong LiuGuangzhou Building Materials Institute

Key Points

  • The research aims to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of reliability analysis in geotechnical engineering using a novel framework.
  • Introduced AEGPR-MCS, integrating ensemble modeling, active learning, and Monte Carlo simulation.
  • Utilized active learning to select critical training samples for surrogate model refinement.
  • Positioned new training samples near the limit state surface to optimize computational efficiency.
  • Employed an adaptive ensemble model for dynamic weight adjustments to enhance robustness.
  • Validation through three geotechnical examples revealed significant improvements in computational efficiency.
  • The AEGPR-MCS method demonstrated enhanced prediction accuracy compared to existing methods.
  • It achieved reliable and precise reliability assessments while reducing computational resource requirements.

Abstract

Purpose Surrogate models are frequently used to alleviate the computational cost associated with reliability analysis in geotechnical engineering; however, efficiently training high-accuracy surrogate models remains a significant challenge. This paper aims to introduce AEGPR-MCS, a robust framework that integrates the ensemble model, active learning strategy and Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) to perform the reliability analysis for various geotechnical systems. Design/methodology/approach AEGPR-MCS leverages an ensemble model as a substitute for complex, computationally intensive and implicit geotechnical mechanical models. It incorporates active learning to iteratively choose the most important training samples, ensuring that the surrogate model is trained with both precision and efficiency. The added new training samples are strategically positioned near the limit state surface, which significantly improves model efficiency by focusing computational resources on the most critical regions. Moreover, the adaptive ensemble model dynamically adjusts the weights of its components to enhance predictive robustness across various geotechnical systems. Findings Validation through three geotechnical examples demonstrates significant improvements in both computational efficiency and prediction accuracy over other methods. The AEGPR-MCS method provides reliable and precise reliability assessments for different geotechnical engineering problems while significantly reducing computational resource requirements, making it a well-suited and versatile approach for addressing a broad spectrum of geotechnical reliability challenges. Originality/value This study presents a robust methodology where the active learning strategy plays a pivotal role in identifying the most informative training samples, primarily those located near the limit state surface. This strategic approach allows the surrogate model to be developed iteratively, promoting both precision and resource efficiency. Furthermore, AEGPR-MCS’s adaptive ensemble model dynamically adjusts the weights of its components, thus bolstering its robustness across diverse geotechnical systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe3f995ddcd3a253e811chttps://doi.org/10.1108/mlag-02-2025-0006
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Multivariate copula-based framework for stochastic analysis of landslide runout distance2024 · 33 citations
  2. 2An improved BUS approach for Bayesian inverse analysis of soil parameters incorporating extensive field data2024 · 17 citations
  3. 3Reliability Analysis of RC Slab-Column Joints under Punching Shear Load Using a Machine Learning-Based Surrogate Model2022 · 29 citations
  4. 4Response surface methods for slope reliability analysis: Review and comparison2015 · 306 citations
  5. 5Popular Ensemble Methods: An Empirical Study1999 · 2,991 citations