PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 27, 2026Future Batteries3 citationsOpen Access

A Systematic Review of the Life Cycle Analysis of Sodium-Ion Batteries

View Full Paper
LALuis Alfredo Carmona ArrietaFuel Cells and HydrogenCMCatarina R. MatosFuel Cells and HydrogenPCPaula Sanz Camacho

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions of sodium-ion batteries compared to lithium-ion batteries.
  • Conducted a systematic review of existing life cycle assessments (LCA) for sodium-ion batteries.
  • Analyzed literature on SIB chemistry, technologies, and methods.
  • Examined greenhouse gas emissions across cradle-to-gate and cradle-to-grave approaches.
  • Layered oxide chemistry shows potential for low environmental impact.
  • Sodium-ion batteries exhibit GHG emissions of 50 kg CO2-eq/kWh (cradle-to-gate) and 37 kg CO2-eq/kWh (cradle-to-grave).
  • Emissions are reduced by 8% to 25% compared to lithium-ion batteries, indicating significant potential for mitigation.

Abstract

Battery technologies are crucial for decarbonizing the energy system, serving various roles such as providing stationary storage to deliver renewable energy on demand and supporting mobility. Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are the leading technology due to their high energy density, numerous charge-discharge cycles, and low self-discharge rates. However, the extraction of lithium is geographically concentrated, with 90% of its production coming from just three countries, creating geographical risks for supply chains and dependent consumers. Similar concerns arise for other materials used in LIBs, such as Nickel, Copper, and Cobalt. In contrast, resources for the production of Sodium-Ion Batteries (SIBs) are more widely accessible, and they pose fewer safety concerns while offering better economic prospects than LIBs. Therefore, evaluating their sustainability and associated GHG emissions can guide their future design and deployment. In this systematic review of Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) of SIBs, we critically analyse existing literature on SIBs in terms of chemistry, technologies, methods, and best practices. It is found that the layered oxide chemistry is a promising alternative for a low environmental impact, with GHG emissions of 50 and 37 kg CO2-eq/kWh for the cradle-to-gate and cradle-to-grave approaches, respectively, based on the European electricity grid mix and assuming TRL 4-5. These figures represent a reduction of 8% to 25% compared to LIBs, indicating a substantial potential for emissions mitigation, which can be further enhanced by exclusively using renewable energy. Although the aforementioned values relate to the energy carriers currently in use, the application of renewable energy sources in battery production and usage is strongly recommended to achieve a low-emission life cycle. Based on this, we suggest future research directions for LCA practitioners and technology developers, emphasizing eco-design principles.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Arrieta et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a134dded1d949a99abe51ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.fub.2026.100162
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper