PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 27, 2026The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal0 citations

Disparities in Cleft Care for Hispanic/Latino Patients in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

View Full Paper
ANAntoinette T. NguyenRLRena A. LiRGRobert D. Galiano

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the disparities in access to and outcomes of cleft care for Hispanic/Latino patients compared to their non-Hispanic White counterparts.
  • Conducted a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines.
  • Analyzed studies using national databases, state registries, and institutional cohorts.
  • Compared surgical timing and outcomes between Hispanic/Latino children and non-Hispanic White children.
  • Hispanic/Latino patients faced significant delays in primary repairs, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.90 for cleft lip repair.
  • Higher rates of bone grafting after age 12 were found in Hispanic/Latino patients (24.4% vs. 19.4%, P = .0049).
  • Cleft-related mortality increased for Hispanic/Latino patients, with an odds ratio of 1.54.
  • Postoperative complications were similar, but Hispanic/Latino patients experienced longer hospital stays and higher charges.

Abstract

ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate disparities in access, timing, and outcomes of cleft care for Hispanic/Latino patients in the United States.DesignSystematic review and random-effects meta-analysis conducted per PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO CRD420251053224).SettingUS-based studies using national databases, state registries, and institutional cohorts.Patients, ParticipantsHispanic/Latino children with cleft lip and/or palate compared to non-Hispanic White children.InterventionsPrimary cleft lip and palate repair and secondary cleft-related procedures, including alveolar bone grafting.Main Outcome Measure(s)Timing of surgical interventions, postoperative complications, mortality, hospital charges, secondary procedure utilization, and patient-reported outcomes.ResultsTwenty-eight studies encompassing 30,006 Hispanic/Latino patients met inclusion criteria. Eight studies addressed surgical timing: Hispanic/Latino patients had significantly delayed primary repairs (eg, adjusted hazard ratio aHR 0.90 for cleft lip repair; odds ratio OR 2.76 for delayed palate repair) and higher rates of bone grafting after age 12 (24.4% vs. 19.4%, P = .0049). Three studies reported mixed patterns of secondary procedure utilization, with underuse of some operations (OR 0.29 for higher surgery frequency) but overrepresentation in cleft rhinoplasty (OR 1.36). Two national datasets showed elevated cleft-related mortality (OR 1.54; HR 1.3-1.7). While postoperative complication rates were largely equivalent, Hispanic/Latino patients experienced longer hospital stays and higher charges in several analyses. Meta-analysis of 2 studies on delayed surgery yielded a pooled OR of 2.11 (95% confidence interval 0.23-19.80) with low heterogeneity but wide uncertainty.ConclusionsHispanic/Latino patients face multifaceted disparities in cleft care-particularly delayed surgery and fragmented follow up-despite comparable technical outcomes. Targeted interventions addressing structural, linguistic, and cultural barriers are needed to advance equity in cleft treatment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nguyen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a1350eed1d949a99abe9bfhttps://doi.org/10.1177/10556656261420517
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper