Commentary critiques the foundational economy agenda in economic geography, highlighting implications of 'fallen below'.
This commentary responds to Bassens et al.'s call for a ‘foundational economy’ agenda in economic geography around the ‘fallen below’ and foundational liveability. I argue that their critique of the ‘left behind places’ literature lands and that their geographical synthesis of systems of provision, everyday lifeworlds, and political subjectification offers a promising research agenda for the present moment. However, I argue, the concept of ‘fallen below’ is a more destabilising category than they currently account for.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Callum Ward (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: