Prospective trial compares cold snare and hot snare polypectomy outcomes in familial adenomatous polyposis, showing non-inferiority and better efficiency for cold snare.
Background and aims: Evidence for cold snare polypectomy (CSP) in treating 10-19 mm colorectal adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is limited. This study compared the efficacy and safety of CSP vs. hot snare polypectomy (HSP). Methods: This prospective non-inferiority randomized controlled trial predefined a non-inferiority margin of 4%. A total of 452 colorectal adenomas (10-19 mm) from 41 FAP patients were enrolled between May 2024 and May 2025 and randomized 1:1 to CSP (n = 220) or HSP (n = 232). The primary endpoint was histological complete resection (R0). Subgroup analyses were performed by lesion size (10-15 mm vs. 16-19 mm). Results: R0 resection rates were similar between CSP and HSP (92.3% vs. 92.7%, p = 0.76). CSP was associated with shorter procedure time (4.53 ± 1.18 vs. 6.53 ± 1.46 min, p < 0.01) and lower hospitalization costs (p < 0.01). Intra-procedural bleeding was more frequent with CSP, whereas delayed bleeding and post-polypectomy electrocoagulation syndrome were more common with HSP. At 6 months, recurrence was rare (one lesion in each group). No significant interaction by lesion size was observed. Conclusions: CSP is non-inferior to HSP for R0 resection of 10-19 mm colorectal adenomas in FAP patients and offers advantages in efficiency, safety and cost.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: