The persistence of cronyism in INEC appointments has significantly undermined Nigeria’s democratic consolidation over the past two decades. This study employs a political economy approach alongside the Marxist theory of the state to critically examine the mechanisms through which crony appointees compromise institutional integrity and facilitate electoral malpractice. Using a secondary data method, the research analyzes historical appointments between 2003 and 2023, highlighting key instances under the administrations of President Olusegun Obasanjo, President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua, President Goodluck Jonathan, President Mohammed Buhari and President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. Findings reveal that cronyism erodes INEC’s institutional autonomy, weakens voter trust, marginalizes opposition actors, and biases decision-making, thereby perpetuating electoral illegitimacy. The study contributes to the literature on democratic consolidation and electoral reform by demonstrating how elite capture and patronage politics intersect to undermine institutional reforms. Recommendations include comprehensive policy interventions, legal reforms, and institutional strengthening to restore the credibility of Nigeria’s electoral processes and consolidate democratic governance. Keywords: Cronyism appointees, democratic electoral consolidation, voter trust, state, ruling class, marginalization, opposition parties, electoral governance, institutional autonomy, elite production
Reason Onya (Wed,) studied this question.