Systematic assessment reveals tiered engagement levels of conscious geometry theory with major scientific and mathematical problems, indicating pathways for future research.
Systematic examination of every major unsolved problem in mathematics and science through the lens of Conscious Geometry Theory (CGT). For each problem: what CGT already provides, what direction CGT indicates, what would constitute a genuine contribution versus a speculative analogy, and what work remains. Problems are ranked into three tiers: Tier 1 — Direct Engagement (12 problems where CGT has existing mathematical machinery, including Yang-Mills mass gap, turbulence, hierarchy problem, and consciousness hard problem); Tier 2 — Indicated Direction (11 problems where CGT's framework points toward an approach but significant work remains); Tier 3 — Suggestive Connections (6 problems where the connection is currently weak). Includes honest assessment of which connections are genuine versus aspirational.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Phileas Foxx (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: