Key result
IL-18 inhibition paradoxically accelerates atherosclerosis progression and necrotic core formation in JAK2-mutant clonal hematopoiesis.
Why the study?
Does antibody inhibition of IL-18 prevent atherosclerosis progression in JAK2V617F clonal hematopoiesis mice?
Does antibody inhibition of IL-18 prevent atherosclerosis progression in JAK2V617F clonal hematopoiesis mice?
IL-18 inhibition in JAK2V617F clonal hematopoiesis paradoxically worsens atherosclerosis by promoting lesion growth and necrotic core formation, challenging the notion that it stabilizes plaques.
Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) driven by JAK2V617F is known to accelerate atherosclerosis through inflammasome activation and release of interleukin (IL)-1β and -18; yet, the specific contribution of IL-18 has remained unclear. In this study, we demonstrate that antibody inhibition of IL-18 in JAK2V617F CH mice increases plaque collagen but paradoxically promotes both early lesion growth and advanced necrotic core formation. Mechanistically, IL-18 blockade reverses absent in melanoma 2 inflammasome activation but shifts cell death toward apoptosis, and together with impaired efferocytosis, results in greater necrosis. These events are coordinated by reduced interferon gamma signaling, which enhances collagen deposition while decreasing expression of efferocytotic genes. Our findings challenge the prevailing notion that IL-18 inhibition stabilizes atherosclerotic plaques and provide new mechanistic insight into the interplay among inflammasome biology, adaptive immunity, and plaque stability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tavallaie et al. (2026) studied Atherosclerosis in JAK2V617F clonal hematopoiesis. Antibody inhibition of IL-18 was evaluated on Atherosclerotic plaque characteristics (collagen, lesion growth, necrotic core formation). Antibody inhibition of IL-18 in JAK2V617F clonal hematopoiesis mice paradoxically promotes early lesion growth and advanced necrotic core formation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: