Exploratory mini-review reveals how music enhances esports performance via cognitive mechanics, indicating potential for tailored applications.
In high-pressure esports, music is often treated as an immersion cue, yet converging evidence suggests it can also function as a cognitive ergogenic aid that modulates performance-relevant states through (i) arousal regulation, (ii) cognitive-load/attention allocation, and (iii) rhythmic entrainment. Quantitative syntheses from adjacent performance domains indicate that music produces small-to-moderate benefits in objective outcomes (e.g., a meta-analytic estimate of improved physical performance, g ≈ 0.31, and more positive affective valence, g ≈ 0.48). Evidence from sustained-attention paradigms further shows that listener-selected background music can yield measurable (albeit small) attentional gains, including faster reactions (≈7.8 ms improvement) and fewer false alarms (e.g., 0.660 vs. 0.710). Under mental-fatigue conditions, a recent systematic review reports that music can attenuate performance decrements—for example, reaction time increased in a no-music control condition (≈500 → 520 ms) but remained stable under music (≈502 → 498 ms) in a Go/NoGo task. However, benefits are boundary-conditioned: music with lyrics reliably impairs cognitive performance with small but credible effects (e.g., d ≈ −0.3 across memory/reading outcomes), whereas lyric-free instrumental music is often closer to null. Finally, because elite esports training and competition depend on rapid visuomotor execution, we highlight rhythmic entrainment as a plausible mechanism, while noting that tournament rules may restrict in-game music, shifting many applications to pre−/between-game windows. Together, this mini-review integrates quantitative evidence into a functional ludomusicology framework and outlines testable predictions for tailoring music by tempo, lyricality, rhythmic salience, and context (training vs. tournament).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: