Economic Model Predictive Control reduces heating costs and energy consumption in homes, suggesting efficiency gains.
• EMPC cuts heating cost by 19.5% under dynamic electricity pricing. • Energy consumption is reduced by about 10% without sacrificing comfort. • Peak electrical demand drops from 3.8 kW to 3.4 kW with EMPC. • Thermal comfort is maintained within 18-22°C in all scenarios. • Real-time feasibility is ensured with low and stable solve times. This study develops and evaluates an Economic Model Predictive Control (EMPC) for residential heating under dynamic electricity pricing, benchmarked against a standard Comfort-Oriented MPC (C-MPC). An RC thermal model is driven by real price traces and weather data. EMPC embeds time-varying tariffs directly in the objective and includes a Δ u penalty to smooth actuation. The evaluation reports cost, energy, peak demand, and comfort, with bootstrap 95% confidence intervals. Robustness is tested under forecast errors in prices and temperature (MAPE 5–20%, bias scenarios). Computational feasibility is quantified through problem size, solver configuration, and per-step solve time relative to the sampling period. Results show −19.5% total heating cost, −10% energy use, and peak demand reduced from 3.8 to 3.4 kW with indoor temperature held in 18–22°C. Savings persist under moderate forecast errors, and the Δ u term lowers total variation in control actions. Solve times remain within the sampling budget, indicating real-time viability. These findings establish that price-aware MPC yields measurable economic and energy benefits without compromising comfort, while remaining implementable on typical building automation stacks. The approach supports demand-response readiness and provides a transparent, reproducible baseline for establishing the theoretical upper bound of economic efficiency in residential heating.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boutahri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: