PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Energy, economic and environmental (3E) analysis of geothermal-based plant operation for reliable power production in cold climates

ADAlireza Dehghani-SanijNatural Resources CanadaNKNima KhakzadAWAndrew WigstonNatural Resources Canada

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the Energy, Economic, and Environmental impacts of geothermal-based power production in cold climates.
  • Conducted a techno-energy analysis using real data from Fort Liard, Canada.
  • Considered three operational scenarios over a 30-year period.
  • Evaluated the Levelized Cost of Electricity and Internal Rate of Return for each scenario.
  • All scenarios provide stable baseload electric power for Fort Liard.
  • Scenario 2 offers the lowest Levelized Cost of Electricity at ~0.074 CAD$/kWh.
  • Scenario 3 incurs pollution due to diesel usage, affecting environmental impact.

Abstract

Geothermal energy, as a wide-spread and low-/zero-carbon source, can help address ongoing and emerging global challenges associated with environmental issues and energy supply reliability. This research reports on an Energy, Economic and Environmental (3E) analysis of geothermal-based plant operation to address the long-term power demands of areas in cold climates with appropriate geothermal potential. A northern Canadian community—Fort Liard (FL), above a hot sedimentary aquifer in the Northwest Territories (NT) —was selected as a representative cold-climate area for this research. Three operational scenarios were considered for a 30-year lifetime: Scenario 1—a geothermal-based plant supplying FL’s power needs; Scenario 2—the plant working at its maximum capacity continuously; and Scenario 3—the geothermal-based plant operating for eleven months, with a diesel facility employed only in June. The primary research’s originality is to utilize real community data/information and system components prices/costs to derive 3E outcomes. The techno-energy analysis indicates that all three scenarios can deliver the stable baseload electric power required by FL. The Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) for Scenarios 1, 2, and 3 is ~ 0. 182, ~ 0. 074, and ~ 0. 176 CAD/kWh, respectively, while FL’s current diesel facility—excluding the government diesel subsidy—incurs a substantially higher LCOE of ~ 0. 70 CAD/kWh. Considering factors such as inflation and discount rates, the economic analysis indicates that for Scenarios 1, 2, and 3, the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) values are, respectively, 14. 1, 27. 8, and 14%, whereas the Return on Investment (ROI) times are, respectively, ~ 10. 7, ~ 5. 4, and ~ 10. 8 years. Environmentally, Scenarios 1 and 2 have minor impacts, while Scenario 3 results in pollution due to utilizing the diesel facility in June. This 3E analysis can be extended to other remote, isolated, and cold-climate areas with favourable geothermal resources and similar geological and social conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dehghani-Sanij et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a286240a974eb0d3c00f12https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39264-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Techno-energy-economic feasibility assessment of hybrid, deep geothermal plants for sustainable, reliable power generation in cold environments2026
  2. 2Assessing Geothermal Potential at Oil and Gas Sites: A Rapid Workflow for Feasibility and Cost Analysis2025
  3. 3The Geothermal Paradox of Choice: A Comparative Techno-Economic Assessment of Geothermal Energy Production for Heat and Power Applications2024
  4. 4Full environmental life cycle costing analysis of repurposing onshore abandoned oil and gas wells for geothermal power generation2026
  5. 5Geothermal Resilience to Energy Production Issues2024