Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative research identifies misrepresentation in marginalized communities, suggesting strategies for authenticity and trust.
Qualitative research in health equity contexts relies on trust, authenticity, and careful interpretation of lived experiences. Yet underrepresented communities, racialized individuals, people with disabilities, and those experiencing socioeconomic marginalization have often been excluded or superficially engaged, reinforcing structural inequities. Participant misrepresentation, including inaccurate demographics or inconsistent narratives, often reflects systemic forces such as racism, economic precarity, and historical mistrust rather than individual deceit. Using intersectionality and community-based participatory research, we illustrate how recruitment, screening, and data collection intersect with participants’ lived experiences. We offer recommendations, including co-developed eligibility, community verification, reflexivity, and culturally responsive engagement, to uphold rigor, trust, and participant well-being.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kokorelias et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: