PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026Scientific Reports5 citationsOpen Access

Sustainable and scalable double slope solar still: a comprehensive experimental assessment of energy, exergy, economic, environmental, sensitivity and distillate performance

View Full Paper
RDRamasamy DhivagarPJP. JidheshRenault (France)SKSung Bae KimYeungnam University

Key Points

  • To evaluate the performance of a reconstructed double slope solar still with integrated photovoltaic panel in enhancing freshwater generation and energy efficiency.
  • Experimental evaluation of the reconstructed double slope solar still design.
  • Analysis of energy, exergy, and economic performance metrics.
  • Assessment of environmental impact and financial feasibility.
  • Conducting sensitivity analysis on system lifespan and carbon credit.
  • Productivity improved by 92.2%, with 44.2% and 46.9% enhancements in energy and exergy efficiencies, respectively.
  • CO₂ emissions reduced by 98.2% compared to traditional systems.
  • Cost per litre of distillate decreased by 17.3%, and payback period reduced by 18.2%.
  • System sustainability rating was 1.6% higher than conventional designs.

Abstract

Abstract In double-slope solar stills (DSS), a significant amount of solar energy is wasted as heat and reducing the system freshwater generation efficiency. To overcome this, a reconstructed double-slope solar still (RDSS) with a photovoltaic panel (PV) mounted on top is proposed which facilitates for simultaneous generation of freshwater, heat, and electricity. The PV panel partial shading is reduced by transferring the generated power to a heating element that preheats the inlet saline water, while paraffin wax phase change material (PCM) improves thermal storage. The experimental results indicated that the RDSS substantially enhanced productivity by 92.2%, with energy and exergy efficiencies improvement of 44.2% and 46.9%, respectively. The PV panel peak power output was 47.1 W, and the system had an efficiency of 14.1% (electrical), 37.1% (thermal), 88.5% (heating element), 52.1% (overall energy), and 5.9% (overall exergy). Economically, the RDSS reduced the cost per litre (CPL) of distillate by 17.3% and the payback period (PBP) by 18.2% than DSS which indicating higher financial feasibility. Additionally, the environmental study revealed that the RDSS achieved 98.2% more CO₂ reduction than DSS. In sensitivity analysis, the extending system lifespan from 5 to 25 years lowered production costs by 73.1% at a 2.5% interest rate, but CO₂ mitigation and carbon credit earned (CCE) elevated by 536%. Moreover, the RDSS had a 1.6% higher sustainability rating than DSS, though both systems generated potable water that met world health organization (WHO) requirements. Finally, these findings support RDSS as a low-cost, ecologically friendly and scalable alternative for decentralized freshwater and energy generation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dhivagar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a286a70a974eb0d3c01ce0https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40989-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper