Feature-level fusion method predicts mining-induced subsidence in coal mining areas, highlighting its effectiveness.
This study proposes a feature-level fusion method that integrates Differential Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (D-InSAR) and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle photogrammetry (UAV-P) for monitoring mining-induced subsidence basin (MSB). The method begins by extracting key subsidence characteristics based on the patterns of coal-mining-related surface displacement; the centimeter-level subsidence boundary is determined from D-InSAR data, while the meter-scale deformation at the subsidence center is derived from UAV-P. These extracted features are then used to invert the parameters of the probability integral method (PIM). The subsidence basin predicted by the inverted parameters serves as a criterion to select the superior dataset between the D-InSAR and UAV-derived results. Finally, the selected subsidence data are fused to generate a composite subsidence map. The proposed method was applied to the 2S201 panel in the Wangjiata Coal Mine using eight Sentinel-1A images and two UAV surveys. The fusion results were evaluated for their regional and overall accuracy against 30 ground control points measured by total station and GPS. The results demonstrate that the fusion method not only accurately extracts large-scale deformations in the mining area, with a maximum subsidence of 2.5 m and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.277 m in the subsidence center area, but also precisely identifies the subsidence boundary region with an accuracy of 0.039 m. The fused subsidence basin exhibits an overall accuracy of 0.182 m, which represents a significant improvement of 83.6% and 27.8% over the results obtained using D-InSAR and UAV alone, respectively. This method effectively reconstructs the complete morphology of the mining-induced subsidence basin, confirming its feasibility for practical applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
An et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: