This review uncovers donor selection strategies for HCT, aiming to improve outcomes amid changing guidelines.
Selection of a hematopoietic progenitor cell donor for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo HCT) is essential for treatment planning; however, the parameters that define an "optimal" donor in the modern era are not well defined. Historically, donor-recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatching correlated strongly with risk for graft versus host disease (GVHD) and reduced survival. For this reason, donor selection was typically hierarchical: HLA matched related and unrelated donors were evaluated first, followed by HLA mismatched donors (or deferral of HCT altogether) in patients lacking an HLA matched donor. The advent of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based GVHD prevention has changed this paradigm. Survival outcomes following HLA-mismatched donor HCT with PTCy, including from related haploidentical or HLA-mismatched unrelated donors, are not different than HLA matched donor recipients in recent clinical trials and retrospective studies. These encouraging results present a new challenge: In the PTCy era, how should donors be prioritized among the many potential sources available? Herein we review HLA and non-HLA parameters that inform donor selection and discuss approaches to increase donor availability. Case vignettes focusing on concepts that may be adapted to heterogenous clinical scenarios are presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shaffer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: