Analysis of strategic voting in two-tiered proportional systems reveals district context affects electoral choices.
Many countries employ two-tiered proportional electoral systems in which seats are allocated based on both nationwide and constituency-level results. Nonetheless, whether voters are aware of the constituency-level context and how it affects electoral behavior has received limited academic attention. Drawing on individual-level data from the Norwegian Citizen Panel collected before and after the 2021 Norwegian parliamentary election, this study shows that voters are aware of the constituency-level context, as they adjust their expectations about a party's likelihood of winning a constituency seat based on local electoral strength and district magnitude. Moreover, the constituency-level context affects voting behavior: supporters of parties polling around the 4% national threshold are more likely to defect when their preferred party is electorally unviable in low-magnitude districts, whereas local party strength plays a limited role in high-magnitude districts. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for both national- and constituency-level factors when analyzing electoral behavior in districted proportional systems and demonstrate that variation in district magnitude creates unequal strategic incentives across constituencies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alexander Verdoes (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: