Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This qualitative case study reveals a strategic shift to centralized donor funding in terrorism, suggesting improved risk profiling for financial units.
This study explores the strategic shift in terrorist financing methods employed by the Mujahidin Indonesia Timur (MIT) network, specifically the transition from decentralized crowdfunding to centralized single-donor mechanisms. Using a qualitative case study grounded in Fraud Diamond Theory, this research investigates how foreign philanthropic channels are manipulated to support militant operations. The findings reveal that single donors possess the technical sophistication to exploit transnational financial systems, specifically through the manipulation of Non-Profit Organizations (NPOs) and informal charity networks. Consequently, this study proposes an enhanced risk-profiling framework for Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs) that prioritizes individual behavioral patterns and ideological alignments over mere transactional volumes, offering critical insights for anticipatory counter-terrorism financing measures
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rabitha et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: