PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026Systematic Reviews0 citationsOpen Access

Comparative efficacy and acceptability of sleep interventions for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

MSMasatsugu SakataUniversity of TsukubaEOEdoardo G. OstinelliOxford Health NHS Foundation TrustRYRyuichiro YamamotoEdogawa University

Key Points

  • The aim is to compare the efficacy of sleep interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
  • Conduct a systematic literature search for randomized controlled trials on sleep interventions.
  • Evaluate pharmacological, psychological, and physical interventions for sleep problems.
  • Use the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool for quality assessment.
  • Perform a network meta-analysis to compare different interventions.
  • Assess various sleep-related outcomes and dropouts.
  • Primary outcome focused on sleep onset latency.
  • Secondary outcomes include other sleep variables and sleep disturbances.
  • Findings aim to inform clinicians and caregivers about the effectiveness of sleep interventions.

Abstract

Abstract Background Children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) frequently experience sleep problems. Although various pharmacological, behavioral, and physical interventions have demonstrated efficacy in improving sleep among children with ASD, the relative effectiveness of these interventions remains unclear. Methods We will conduct a systematic literature search to identify randomized controlled trials that evaluate the efficacy of pharmacological (e.g., melatonin), psychological (e.g., cognitive behavioral therapy), and physical (e.g., bright light therapy) interventions for sleep problems in children with ASD. We will search PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane CENTRAL, major trial registries, and regulatory agency websites. We will assess the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB 2.0) tool for primary outcome and the Risk Of Bias due to Missing Evidence in Network meta-analysis (ROB-MEN) tool for the bias due to missing network evidence. A network meta-analysis (NMA) will be performed to compare the included interventions. The primary outcome will be sleep onset latency, while secondary outcomes will include other sleep variables, all-cause dropouts, and sleep disturbances assessed using standardized measures. We will assess confidence in NMA(CINeMA). Discussion Our NMA aims to provide evidence-based insights into the effectiveness of sleep interventions for clinicians, children with ASD, and their caregivers. This information will help guide treatment decisions and improve the quality of life for children with ASD and their families. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42024592795.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sakata et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a288170a974eb0d3c04116https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-026-03143-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper