This article reinterprets Lebanon's financial collapse as a class-based revolt against legalized dispossession, indicating systemic economic inequalities.
This article reinterprets Lebanon’s 2019 financial collapse through the lens of David Harvey’s theory of neoliberalism, with a particular focus on Accumulation by Dispossession (ABD). It argues that dominant paradigms—sectarianism, externalism, merchant republicanism, and anti-colonialism—fail to adequately explain the structural transformations underpinning Lebanon’s post-Taif political economy. By introducing ABD as a legalized, state-sanctioned mechanism of elite enrichment, this study makes a crucial distinction between systemic dispossession embedded in law and institutions and corruption as an illegal or unethical deviation from them. This distinction reframes Lebanon’s crisis not as a failure of governance alone but as the outcome of a deliberate neoliberal project that restructured the economy to facilitate upward wealth transfer. The article draws on Harvey’s framework to reinterpret Lebanon’s neoliberal trajectory and positions the 2019 uprising as a class-based revolt against decades of legalized dispossession. It concludes by calling for a research agenda that centers ABD in analyses of neoliberalism in the Global South.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ziad Anis Koussa (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: