PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026Applied Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

SKE-YOLO11: Robust and Lightweight Automatic Detection of Martian Impact Craters

View Full Paper
JLJiarui LiangJYJiachen YuXTXiaolin Tian

Key Points

  • The aim is to enhance the detection of Martian impact craters using a lightweight and robust model.
  • Developed SKE-YOLO11 with new modules KWConv and C3K2_KW.
  • Introduced a Strip Convolution Module to improve learning from crater textures.
  • Replaced CIoU with Inner-EIoU loss for better bounding-box accuracy.
  • Achieved 83.0% Precision and 75.0% Recall.
  • Observed a 1.8% improvement in mAP@0.5 compared to YOLO11n.
  • Reduced model parameters and GFLOPs significantly by 0.08 M and 1.3.

Abstract

Martian crater detection plays a critical role in landing-site selection and route planning, and it directly influences whether a mission can be executed safely and whether scientific observations and surface material information can be reliably acquired and returned. These outcomes, in turn, affect subsequent investigations of Martian geology and environmental evolution. Despite the progress of recent detectors, missed detections still occur, especially for medium-to-large craters with weak or blurred rims and for small overlapping craters. At the same time, practical deployment often requires a lightweight architecture so that computational cost can be controlled under real operational constraints. To address these issues, we propose SKE-YOLO11, a lightweight model designed for robust crater detection. First, we construct KWConv and C3K2KW to replace the standard convolution and the C3K2 module in YOLO11n. This design reduces computation while strengthening feature extraction for small craters. Second, we introduce a Strip Convolution Module (SCM) to enlarge the effective receptive field, which helps the network learn rim and texture cues of medium-to-large craters and reduces missed detections. Third, considering the geometric characteristics of crater annotations, we fuse EIoU and Inner-IoU into an Inner-EIoU loss to replace the CIoU used in YOLO11n, thus improving bounding-box regression. Experiments show that SKE-YOLO11 achieves 83. 0% Precision, 75. 0% Recall, and 82. 8% mAP@0. 5. Compared with YOLO11n, Recall and mAP@0. 5 improve by 2. 3% and 1. 8%, and parameters and GFLOPs decrease by 0. 08 M and 1. 3, respectively.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a288590a974eb0d3c043abhttps://doi.org/10.3390/app16052295
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection2017 · 27,161 citations
  2. 2The origin of complex crater formation during high-speed impacts2025 · 3 citations
  3. 3Automated Crater Detection, A New Tool for Mars Cartography and Chronology2005 · 141 citations
  4. 4The Pascal Visual Object Classes (VOC) Challenge2009 · 20,042 citations
  5. 5Cratering Chronology and the Evolution of Mars2001 · 903 citations