Cohort study compares right heart catheterization outcomes in patients with pulmonary hypertension, suggesting cubital vein is safer and more efficient.
To assess the feasibility and safety of right heart catheterization (RHC) via the cubital vein. This retrospective-prospective cohort study included 93 patients (January 2020–June 2023) in the retrospective phase, with 48 undergoing cubital vein RHC (R-CV) and 45 femoral vein RHC (R-FV). A prospective phase (July 2023–October 2024) enrolled 60 patients, each undergoing both approaches. Subgroup analysis divided patients by right ventricular end-diastolic diameter (≥ 3.80 cm vs. <3.80 cm). R-CV showed fewer complications (8.89% vs. 0%, p = 0.028) and shorter fluoroscopy time (178.27 ± 43.27 s vs. 210.76 ± 54.80 s, p = 0.002) than R-FV. In patients with right ventricular dilation (≥ 3.80 cm), cubital vein RHC reduced fluoroscopy time compared to femoral vein RHC (p < 0.001). Cubital vein RHC is safe, efficient, and especially advantageous for patients with enlarged right ventricles, warranting wider adoption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: