PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2026EPJ Quantum Technology0 citationsOpen Access

Circuit-based vs. measurement-based quantum computing: a comparative analysis, layered metrics, and decision flow for approach selection

HLHarashta Tatimma LarasatiBandung Institute of TechnologyBCByung-Soo ChoiPukyong National University

Key Points

  • This work aims to systematically compare circuit-based quantum computing (CBQC) and measurement-based quantum computing (MBQC) to identify the most suitable approach for various algorithms.
  • Review theoretical foundations of CBQC and MBQC.
  • Propose a generalized regime analysis for model selection.
  • Identify critical parameters and categorization of performance metrics.
  • Develop a decision flow for model choice based on hardware and algorithm requirements.
  • Test on Quantum Fourier Transform (QFT) and Variational Quantum Algorithm (VQE).
  • MBQC shows advantages over CBQC in specific hardware contexts.
  • Generalized analysis provides insights into model suitability for various quantum algorithms.
  • The decision flow effectively guides model selection based on detailed parameters.

Abstract

Circuit-based quantum computing (CBQC), also known as the gate model, is currently regarded as the leading paradigm for performing quantum computation and has garnered widespread interest due to its relatively better-established implementation and close intuitive resemblance to classical computation. However, an alternative model that solely utilizes single-qubit measurements on entangled states to perform computation, namely the measurement-based quantum computing (MBQC), has started to attract further research interest as it is deemed more naturally suited for certain quantum hardware architectures, though its actual implementation remains largely underexplored. Recently, there have been preliminary efforts to characterize the specific regimes in which MBQC may potentially be more advantageous compared to CBQC. Nevertheless, a more systematic assessment is necessary to assess the suitability of each model across a broader range of more practical cases. In this work, we present a detailed comparative analysis of CBQC and MBQC, beginning with reviewing the theoretical foundations of each model before highlighting its distinguishing features that set the two paradigms apart. Furthermore, building on previous work, we propose a generalized regime analysis that more accurately captures the conditions under which a given quantum algorithm is more favorably executed in MBQC or CBQC. Subsequently, we identify critical parameters that likely determine whether a quantum algorithm is better suited to CBQC or MBQC, categorizing detailed key factors and performance metrics into layers of quantum computation. Next, we propose a decision flow that, given specific hardware constraints and algorithm requirements, guides the selection to the most appropriate model, discussing suitability in two representative worked examples of quantum algorithm applications: Quantum Fourier Transform (QFT) and Variational Quantum Algorithm (VQE). Last, we discuss the potential to combine both models as a hybrid approach to leverage the best of both worlds and explore its benefits for practical quantum computing applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Larasati et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a3d824ec16d51705d2ec65https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-026-00483-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper