Grapevine trunk diseases, particularly Botryosphaeria dieback, pose a major threat to vineyard sustainability, a risk that is further intensified by climate variability and increasing environmental stress. This study evaluated pathogenicity and bacterial biocontrol efficacy against Neofusicoccum parvum and Diplodia seriata under vineyard conditions, analyzing the combined effects of cultivar (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon and Sauvignon Blanc), tissue type (young shoots and lignified arms), and phenological season (autumn/winter and spring/summer). Pathogenicity assays revealed clear tissue-age specialization: N. parvum was more aggressive in young shoots, whereas D. seriata caused the most severe vascular lesions in lignified wood. Seasonality further modulated disease expression, with higher lesion development during spring/summer, particularly for N. parvum in young shoots, while D. seriata maintained high aggressiveness in lignified tissues across both seasons. Berry assays provided a rapid initial assessment of isolate virulence but did not fully reflect pathogen behavior in woody tissue under field conditions. Biological treatments using native bacterial strains (Pseudomonas sp. AMCR2b, GcR15a, and Rhodococcus sp. PU4) significantly reduced lesion severity in V. vinifera under field conditions, although efficacy varied by tissue type and season. Biocontrol effects were generally more stable in lignified arms, and under high disease pressure, only the most robust strains maintained consistent protection, in some cases matching or surpassing the efficacy of the fungicide tebuconazole. These results show that both pathogenicity and biocontrol performance against Botryosphaeria dieback in V. vinifera under field conditions are strongly influenced by tissue type and season, supporting bacterial biocontrol as a sustainable component of integrated disease management in vineyards.
Castillo-Novales et al. (2026) studied this question.