Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative analysis reveals organized nevi distribution patterns in subjects with distinct iris pigmentation, indicating potential implications for pathology identification.
Updated release v3. Adds Golden Angle Analysis (Auric Index A) connecting iris nevi spatial distribution to Vogel phyllotaxis model. SUBJECT A (brown iris, calibrated): 29 nevi. D_global=1.868. D_nevi=1.572±0.115. Auric Index A=0.847. SUBJECT B/OL (green-hazel, sectorial heterochromia, calibrated): 23 nevi. D_global=1.836. D_nevi=1.629±0.086. Auric Index A=0.840. NEW v3: Auric Index A measures golden angle organization of nevi angular distribution. Monte Carlo significance test. Spearman correlation D fractal vs golden proximity. Panels H1-H5 added. Both subjects show consistent A≈0.84, suggesting non-random angular organization. Validation requires n=40-50 cohort. IrisAnalyzerV4.1 quality check module added (sharpness, brightness, contrast gates for dataset scaling). Related preprint: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18781344Phyllotaxis base: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18760369Dataset v2: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18799576
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jose Ranero García (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: