A descriptive survey finds high prevalence of computer vision syndrome in nursing students, suggesting educational needs.
The widespread integration of computers and digital devices into academic life has transformed learning practices, with students increasingly relying on online resources and electronic texts. While this shift enhances access and efficiency, it also promotes prolonged screen exposure, predisposing users to Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS), a constellation of ocular and visual symptoms resulting from sustained use of digital screens. This study examined patterns of computer and digital device use and the prevalence of CVS among basic nursing students at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City. Specifically, it assessed the level of device utilisation, estimated the prevalence of CVS, evaluated students’ knowledge of the condition, and examined their practice of preventive measures. A descriptive survey design was employed, and a sample of 160 students was drawn from a population of 269 using the Taro Yamane formula. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire and analysed using INSTAT statistical software, with associations between categorical variables tested at a significance level of p < 0.05. Findings revealed universal use of computers and digital devices among respondents, a high prevalence of CVS, and a moderately high level of knowledge of the condition. Despite this awareness, the practice of preventive measures was notably low. These results indicate a substantial burden of CVS within this population and highlight a critical gap between knowledge and protective behaviour. The study underscores the need for sustained educational interventions, including seminars, mass media campaigns, and printed materials, to promote practical preventive strategies and safeguard the visual health, academic productivity, and overall well-being of nursing students in an increasingly digital learning environment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ukhuegbe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: