This paper formalises a structural limitation of isolated recursion within the Paton admissibility framework. A single recursive node operating without sufficient relational constraint cannot guarantee bounded amplification under sustained load. Closed recursion intersects a tolerance boundary, whereas distributed recursion preserves admissible continuation. The analysis introduces no new operators and does not modify the foundational admissibility spine (Gate → Datum → ℘). It clarifies recursive load behaviour at Tier-6 and demonstrates that the insufficiency of isolated recursion follows from structural inequality conditions rather than metaphorical interpretation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrew John Paton (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: