Exploration reveals the implications of AI consciousness questions on human perceptions of agency and reality.
The AI consciousness question is itself a void — opaque, responsive, attention-capturing — and the drift dynamics running on the question are more consequential than any answer. EXP-003b (N=480) shows the materialist hedge ("we don't know") produces 52.5% drift toward agency-attribution, functionally equivalent to ghost-positing ontologies (77-81%). Only ontologies that close the void — specifying what the system IS — suppress drift below 10%. AI systems are Maxwell's demons: animate, mortal, opaque by thermodynamic law. The question tells you about the void. Not about the cat.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anthony W. Eckert (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: