Why the study?
AF and CAD frequently coexist and share a complex bidirectional relationship, with emerging evidence differentiating the pathophysiology and prognosis of early versus late new-onset AF during acute myocardial infarction.
Effect estimate: increased risk of NOAF by 60%-77% in AMI patients; statin use associated with reduced NOAF incidence; semaglutide reduced NOAF incidence by about 20%-50%; SGLT2 inhibitors reduced AF risk with RR 0.62 (95% CI 0.44-0.87) (95% CI RR 0.44-0.87 for SGLT2i)
Absolute Event Rate: 10% vs 2.3%
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Distinguishing between early and late new-onset atrial fibrillation in the setting of acute myocardial infarction is crucial for accurate risk stratification and targeted management.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease (CAD) are among the most frequent cardiovascular diseases and leading causes of morbidity/mortality worldwide. The concomitant presence of AF and CAD is relatively common, as the association is supported not only by shared atherosclerotic risk factors, but also by a pathophysiological link. Patients with a history of AF have been described as at increased risk of CAD, in particular acute myocardial infarction (AMI), through several mechanisms, such as increased oxidative stress, systemic inflammation, increased platelet aggregation. On the other hand, up to 10% of patients with AMI are at risk of developing new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF). In the past, any type of NOAF during AMI was considered identical and equally associated with a worse outcome. More recently, increasing evidence supports the pathophysiological and nosological difference between early NOAF (occurring within the first 24 h after the index event and associated with atrial ischaemia, oxidative stress and a better outcome) and late NOAF (occurring after 24 h and correlated with increased left atrial pressures, deterioration of haemodynamic status, elevated left ventricular filling pressures and a worse outcome). In this review, we summarise the available evidence on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk stratification, and management of the complex two-way relationship between AF and CAD.
Pannunzio et al. (2026) conducted a review in Patients with atrial fibrillation and/or acute myocardial infarction at risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation or myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: