Remote programming demonstrates similar effectiveness in speech recognition and communication quality compared to in-person sessions, suggesting a viable alternative.
Remote programming was found to be as effective as in-person programming, as it provided access to the programming parameters and objective measures used in in-person sessions. Speech recognition results were similar for programs created in person and remotely. Participants indicated that the remote programming method and the resulting program were useful and acceptable, and that they experienced similar ease and quality of communication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andreoli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: