PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 2, 2026ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering4 citationsOpen Access

Life Cycle Assessment of Diethyl Carbonate (DEC) and Glycerol Carbonate (GC) Coproduction from Bioethanol, CO 2 , and Glycerol

View Full Paper
BCBushra ChalermthaiPTPiyawan ThanahiranyaSASuttichai Assabumrungrat

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the environmental impacts of producing diethyl carbonate and glycerol carbonate from bioethanol and CO2.
  • Conducted a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA) for DEC and GC production.
  • Utilized bioethanol from lignocellulosic biomass and crude glycerol from used vegetable oil.
  • Analyzed environmental impacts against literature values and industry benchmarks.
  • Life cycle assessment results were within the lower range compared to existing literature.
  • Global warming impact was lower than benchmarks from the global chemical industry.
  • The optimal scenario used bioethanol from lignocellulosic biomass; the worst involved maize as a feedstock.

Abstract

Diethyl carbonate (DEC) can be sustainably produced from bioethanol and captured CO2, and then used with crude glycerol to produce glycerol carbonate (GC), both of which are high-value products. DEC is an electrolyte in lithium batteries and a precursor for polycarbonates, while GC is a versatile, eco-friendly solvent in cosmetics and a precursor for polymers like polyurethanes and coatings. While these productions are techno-economically profitable, their environmental impacts have not been comprehensively studied. This study conducts the first-ever, novel, comprehensive cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA) for DEC and GC production following the green chemistry principles. The overall results were within the lower range when compared to the literature. The global warming impact was lower than both the literature and the global chemical industry benchmarks. Uncertainty analysis showed that most impact categories’ results were reliable. Utilizing bioethanol from lignocellulosic biomass and crude glycerol from the esterification of used vegetable oil was the best scenario, while using maize as a feedstock for bioethanol production instead of sugarcane was the worst case. Future recommendations include investigating other crops and lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol. These results provide essential new environmental data to complement techno-economic assessments and support sustainable fine/specialty chemical production.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chalermthai et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a528ecf1e85e5c73bf05c4https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c13182
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Current progress on lignocellulosic bioethanol including a technological and economical perspective2024 · 47 citations
  2. 2ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level2016 · 4,349 citations
  3. 3Life cycle assessment of mini-hydropower plants in Thailand2011 · 73 citations
  4. 4A Brief Review on Industrial Alternatives for the Manufacturing of Glycerol Carbonate, a Green Chemical2012 · 244 citations
  5. 5The environmental impacts of palm oil in context2020 · 396 citations