Narrative review assesses inner retinal changes during anti-VEGF treatment in neovascular AMD, suggesting careful monitoring.
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is the cornerstone of care for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), yet its effects on the inner retina are not widely studied. We conducted a narrative review, guided by the SANRA checklist, to map evidence on peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (pRNFL), macular RNFL, and ganglion cell–derived metrics (GCL/GCIPL/GCC) during anti-VEGF treatment. Major databases were searched from inception to 10 November 2025 for human studies reporting optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements of inner-retinal structure during anti-VEGF treatment. Data were charted for study design, OCT device/segmentation, scan protocol, timing relative to injections, treatment regimen, fluid phenotype (intraretinal fluid [IRF], subretinal fluid [SRF], pigment epithelial detachment [PED]), follow-up interval, and magnitude of change (μm). Across cohorts and agents, global pRNFL thickness was largely stable over weeks to years, with short-term peri-injection fluctuations typically within device test–retest limits. In contrast, macular ganglion cell layers more often showed modest thinning over time, most consistently in eyes with baseline IRF; SRF-predominant disease showed less consistent inner-retinal change. Apparent between-agent differences were small and inconsistent; evidence specific to faricimab remains limited but generally reassuring for structural stability. Overall, most observed changes were often within OCT test–retest variability. In practice, clinicians should prioritise GCL/GCIPL monitoring where IRF is present, interpret small absolute changes against device repeatability, and avoid attributing trivial sectoral shifts to drug toxicity without corroboration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsiropoulos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: