PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 2, 20261 citations

Prediction and risk factor analysis of dental implant failure using Cox regression and machine learning.

View Full Paper
IHIn-Kyung HwangGangneung–Wonju National UniversitySASoo Ho AhnSeoul National University Dental HospitalSKSeong-Kyun KimSeoul National University Dental Hospital

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze dental implant failures and identify associated risk factors using statistical and machine-learning techniques.
  • Analyzed 543 implants placed in 256 patients monitored over an average of 8 years.
  • Developed traditional survival analysis models using Cox regression.
  • Evaluated three machine-learning models: RSF, DeepSurv, and TabNet.
  • 32 implant failures were recorded during the monitoring period.
  • RSF model showed the highest predictive performance among machine-learning approaches.
  • Cox model outperformed machine-learning models when adjusted for patient- and implant-related characteristics.

Abstract

Dental implants are a well-established treatment for replacing missing teeth; however, reports of associated complications are increasing. Identifying risk factors and estimating the likelihood of failure can assist clinicians in treatment planning and follow-up care. In this study, we analyzed 543 implants placed in 256 patients with disabilities, monitored over an average of 8 years, during which 32 implant failures occurred. We first developed traditional statistical models using Cox regression, a well-established method for survival analysis. Then, we evaluated three modern machine-learning models capable of handling time-to-event outcomes: RSF, DeepSurv, and TabNet. Among the machine-learning approaches, the tree-based RSF demonstrated the highest predictive performance; however, it did not outperform the best Cox model after adjusting for several patient- and implant-related characteristics. Both RSF and Cox models consistently identified anterior implant placement and replacement of periodontitis-related tooth loss as the strongest predictors of failure. Our findings suggest that newer machine-learning tools do not inherently outperform conventional models, particularly in datasets with few events. The selection of analytical methods should be guided by dataset size and event frequency rather than the novelty of the algorithm.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hwang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a52dbff1e85e5c73bf0c69https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.70112
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper