PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 2, 2026Journal of Knowledge Management5 citations

Harnessing generative AI for next-gen education: a cognitive load and knowledge-based view approach to fuel innovation

View Full Paper
IAIntesar AlmugrenJRJaskirat Singh RaiDKDiana Korayim

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the relationship between generative AI knowledge and students' innovation abilities and information literacy skills.
  • Surveyed 250 students using generative AI in educational settings.
  • Developed an empirical model based on knowledge-based view and cognitive load theories.
  • Utilized partial least squares structural equation modeling for analysis.
  • Generative AI knowledge acquisition boosts students' innovation ability.
  • Generative AI application negatively impacts information literacy skills.
  • Innovation ability increases students' motivation and behavioral intentions.
  • Information literacy negatively affects students' motivation with no significant effect on behavioral intentions.

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine how students’ generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) knowledge acquisition and knowledge application are associated with their innovation ability and information literacy (IL) skills. It further explores how these factors are associated with their level of motivation and behavioral intentions (BI). Design/methodology/approach The study collected responses from 250 students using GenAI for their educational purposes. Based on the knowledge-based view (KBV) and cognitive load theories (CLT), the study developed an empirical model assessed using the partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) method. Findings The findings reveal that GenAI knowledge acquisition significantly enhances students’ innovation ability, while GenAI knowledge application exhibits a negative but significant relationship with IL. Students’ innovation abilities, backed by GenAI, positively influence their level of motivation and BI. However, IL negatively impacts students’ level of motivation and shows no significant effect on their BI. Originality/value The study results support KBV and CLT theories that effective utilization of knowledge resources fosters students’ innovation ability, while excessive cognitive load can hinder their learning processes. Current research contributes to both theory and practice and offers insights for educators and policymakers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Almugren et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a52dbff1e85e5c73bf0d7ahttps://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-07-2025-0957
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Understanding knowledge management engagement, learning motivation and effectiveness in the age of generative artificial intelligence2025
  2. 2Understanding students’ learning attitudes and behaviors toward generative AI: an integrated social cognitive theory and diffusion of innovation perspective2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3The Impact of Generative AI on University Students’ Learning Experience2025 · 4 citations
  4. 4Knowledge enablers and barriers in generative AI adoption: educator perspectives from higher education2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5Modelling Generative AI’s Influence on Students’ Perceived Decision Capability: A Cognitive Load and Decision Augmentation Approach2026